Vector Quality Sciences
VECTORQuality Sciences
Staff Augmentation

Embedded RBQM Data Analyst: Scaling Quality Oversight for a Global Oncology Portfolio

Top 10 Pharmaceutical Company
18-Month Engagement
12 Trials Supported

The Challenge

A Top 10 pharmaceutical company had successfully implemented an RBQM platform across their oncology portfolio but was struggling to scale their quality oversight program. Their internal team of 3 data analysts was supporting 12 active Phase II/III trials, and the workload was becoming unsustainable.

Key Pain Points

  • • KRI development backlog: 6-8 weeks per trial
  • • Limited bandwidth for custom analytics
  • • No time for team training or process improvement
  • • Reactive monitoring instead of proactive risk detection

Business Impact

  • • Delayed trial startups (4-6 weeks per trial)
  • • Missed risk signals due to capacity constraints
  • • Team burnout and turnover risk
  • • Limited ROI from RBQM platform investment

The Solution

I was brought in as an embedded RBQM Data Analyst for an 18-month engagement. Rather than just filling a resource gap, the goal was to build sustainable processes and train the internal team to operate independently after the engagement ended.

Phase 1: Immediate Impact (Months 1-3)

Cleared the KRI development backlog and established standardized processes.

  • KRI Development Sprint: Developed 45 custom KRIs across 4 trials in 8 weeks (vs. 24-32 weeks with internal team alone)
  • Process Standardization: Created KRI development templates and data mapping documentation to reduce future development time by 40%
  • Quick Wins: Identified 3 high-risk sites across 2 trials within first month, triggering immediate mitigation actions

Phase 2: Advanced Analytics (Months 4-9)

Built custom analytics capabilities that went beyond standard KRIs.

  • Custom R Shiny Dashboard: Developed portfolio-level risk dashboard aggregating data across 12 trials for executive visibility
  • Predictive Analytics: Built enrollment forecasting models using historical site performance data (improved accuracy by 25%)
  • Automated Reporting: Created automated weekly risk reports using R Markdown, saving 8 hours/week of manual report generation

Phase 3: Knowledge Transfer (Months 10-18)

Trained the internal team to sustain and expand the RBQM program independently.

  • Team Training Program: Conducted 12 training sessions covering KRI development, statistical methods, and dashboard creation
  • Documentation: Created comprehensive SOPs, training materials, and code repositories for all custom analytics
  • Transition Plan: Gradually handed off responsibilities over final 3 months with ongoing support and code reviews
Before vs After

Transformation at a Glance

Before Engagement

KRI Development Time
6-8 weeks
Portfolio Coverage
12 trials
Custom Analytics
None
Team Capacity
At limit

After 18 Months

KRI Development Time(65% faster)
2-3 weeks
Portfolio Coverage(50% increase)
18 trials
Custom Analytics
5 dashboards
Team Capacity
30% headroom

The Results

65%
Faster KRI Development
Reduced from 6-8 weeks to 2-3 weeks per trial through standardized templates and processes
$450K
Cost Savings
Avoided 3 unplanned site visits through early risk detection (estimated $150K per visit)
100%
Team Retention
Zero turnover in internal RBQM team during engagement (vs. 33% industry average)

Additional Outcomes

Operational Improvements

  • Trial startup time reduced by 4 weeks on average
  • Portfolio-level risk visibility for executive leadership
  • Automated reporting saving 8 hours/week per analyst
  • Standardized KRI library reusable across future trials

Team Capability Building

  • 3 internal analysts trained in advanced R programming
  • Comprehensive SOP documentation for all processes
  • Code repository with reusable analytics templates
  • Team operating independently 6 months post-engagement
"We brought in Vector Quality to fill a resource gap, but they delivered so much more. The custom analytics capabilities they built transformed how we oversee our portfolio. More importantly, they trained our team to sustain and expand the program after they left. That knowledge transfer was invaluable."
Director of Clinical Quality, Top 10 Pharmaceutical Company

Key Takeaways

1. Staff Augmentation ≠ Just Adding Bodies

The best staff augmentation engagements focus on building sustainable capabilities, not just delivering short-term output. Knowledge transfer should be baked into the engagement from day one.

2. Standardization Unlocks Scale

Creating reusable templates, code libraries, and documentation reduces future development time dramatically. The 40% time savings on KRI development came from standardization, not just adding another analyst.

3. Advanced Analytics Require Specialized Skills

Custom R Shiny dashboards, predictive modeling, and automated reporting require programming skills that most clinical teams don't have. Bringing in specialized expertise can unlock capabilities that would take years to build internally.

Download Case Study

Get a one-page summary of this project for offline review or internal sharing.

Perfect for budget approval meetings and stakeholder reviews

Need Embedded RBQM Support for Your Team?

I provide staff augmentation services for RBQM programs, focusing on immediate impact and long-term capability building. Engagements typically range from 6-18 months. Let's discuss your needs.

We value your privacy

We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, serve personalized content, and analyze our traffic. By clicking "Accept", you consent to our use of cookies. Read our Privacy Policy.